š² LOGIC OF HOMEOPATHY š² š³ LOGIC ā¾The word logic is derived from the Greek adjective āLogikeā corresponding to the Greek word āLogosā which means thought or word, idea, argument, account, reason, or principle as the expression of thought. ā¾The use of the same word Logos to denote both thought and word to emphasize the close relation between thought and itās expression in language. ā¾Hence etymologically Logic is the science of thought as expressed in the language. š³ DEFINITIONS OF LOGIC š³ ā¾Science of the operation of the understanding that the subservient to the destination of the evidence for the process itself advancing from known truths to unknown and all other intellectual operations insofar as auxiliary to this. ā MILL. ā¾The branch of philosophy that analyzes inference ā¾Reasoned and reasonable judgment ā¾The principles that guide reasoning within a given field or situation ā¾A System of reasoning ā¾The Art of reasoning ā¾Science of reasoning ā¾The Science of thought ā¾The Science of the formal laws of thought ā¾The Science of the understanding in the pursuit of the truth. ā¾Use of ability in argument š³ HISTORY š³ ā¾Many cultures have employed intricate systems of reasoning and asked questions about logic or propounded logical paradoxes. ā¾In India the Nasadiya Sukta of the Rig-Veda (RV 10.129) ā¾contains ontological speculation in terms of various logical divisions that were later recast formally as the four circles of catuskoti: āAā, ānot Aā, āA and not Aā, and ānot A and not not Aā. ā¾Tharka, Vitharka & Kutharka are different forms of logic and argument. ā« CHINESE PHILOSOPHER GONGSUN LONG (325ā250 BC) ā¾proposed the paradox ā One and one cannot become two, since neither becomes two. ā¾The first sustained work on the subject of logic which has survived was that of Aristotle. ā« ARISTOTLE (384 ā 312 B.C) CAN BE CALLED AS THE FATHER OF LOGIC. ā¾According to Aristotle Logic is the important Instrument for acquisition of genuine knowledge. ā¾Logic is an elaboration of methods in search of all knowledge and it is called as science of sciences. ā¾He was the founder of both Deductive and Inductive Logic. ā¾Logic is concerned with thought forms and thinking process to achieve truth. ā¾He was the first to conceive systematic treatment of correct inference. ā¾His method of Logic has been explained in his book āPrior Analyticus ā« LORD FRANCIS BACON (1561 ā 1626 A.D) ā¾formulated the new system of Logic in his book āNovum Organumā to highlight the importance of inductive logic . ā¾Before Lord Baconās time, Logic was used principally as an instrument for argument and disputation. ā¾Little or no attention were given to facts. ā¾He demolished innumerable false systems and restored Logic to itās true place as the guide to truth. ā« GEORGE WILHELM FRIEDRICH HEGEL (1770- 1831) : ā¾One of His major work has been titled as āScience of Logicā. ā¾He emphasized on the part to whole relationship. ā¾He said any organic whole is more than mere sum of its parts. ā« JOHN STUART MILL (1806 ā 1873 A.D) ā¾He succeeded bacon emphasizing the practical utility of inductive logic in his book titled āSystems of knowledgeā ā¾It is theĀ study of principles and methods of reasoning or arguments and conclusions. ā¾Conclusions are formed from these arguments. ā¾Aristotle was the first person to use useĀ ā logic ā as the subject of reasoning. ā¾TheĀ OrganonĀ is the standard collection of Aristotleās six works on logic. ā¾TheĀ Novum Organumis a philosophicalĀ workĀ by Francis Bacon. ā¾In this he mentioned about different types of logic. ā¾ImportantĀ properties theĀ logical systems ā¶ CONSISTENCYĀ : ā” which means that no theorem of the system contradicts another. ā” it must not be subjected to changes ā¶ VALIDITYĀ : ā” the logic must be valid and true so that the inference acquiredafter the application of that logic will never go wrong. ā¶ COMPLETENESSĀ : ā” the logic must be complete in all aspects andnothing needs to be added to it. ā¶SOUNDNESSĀ : ā” having the property of preserving truth. ā” it also describes the completeness and validity of the statement. ā” Logic is often divided into three parts, inductive logic, abductive logic, and deductive logic š³ TYPES š³ ā¾1. Deductive Logic [ Formal Logic ] ā¾2. Inductive Logic [Logic of Reality or Truth / Material Logic] š³ OTHER TYPES: ā¾1.Informal logic: is the study of natural language arguments. The study of fallacies is an especially important branch of informal logic. The dialogues of Plato are a major example of informal logic. ā¾2. Symbolic logic: is the study of symbolic abstractions that capture the formal features of logical inference. Symbolic logic is often divided into two branches, propositional logic and predicate logic. ā¾3. Mathematical logic: is an extension of symbolic logic into other areas, in particular to the study of model theory, proof theory, set theory, and recursion theory. ā¬ INDUCTIVE LOGIC ā¶It is also called ābottom-upā logic. ā¶It is a scientific methode Ā that Ā proceeds by the process of induction. ā¶it can be accepted only by experience. ā¶hence the inductive logic is called the logic of truth and reality.Ā ā¶Lord Francis Bacon isĀ consideredĀ as the father of Inductive logic. ā¶This procedure draws universal conclusion or inference from the experience based on particular premises. ā¶This logic proceeds from particular premises to generalized or universal conclusions. ā¶It derives a general conclusion from a particular examples. inductive reasoning allowsĀ the possibility that the conclusion is false, even if all of the premises are true. EXĀ :Ā All of the swans we have seen are white. Therefore, all swans are white. ā¬ DEDUCTIVE LOGIC ā¶It is also called ātop-downā logic. ā¶it is aĀ methodĀ of logic, a process of reasoning from "generalized premises to particularĀ inference". ā¶here a particular conclusion is drawn from universal or general premises. ā¶if the general premises is true, than the particular conclusion derived from this premise must also be true. ā¶the conclusion of the deductive arguments never goes beyond the agreed general premise. ā¶in this particular conclusions are made from universal general statement. ā¶The conclusion derived at the end is necessarily true. EXĀ :Ā All oranges are fruits All fruits grow on trees Therefore, all oranges grow on trees ā¬ ABDUCTIVE LOGIC ā¶It accounts for data description of a statement to a hypothesis that accounts for the reliable data and seeks to explain relevant evidence. EXĀ :Ā Ā Ā ā¦ Data Statementā-the soil is wet Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ā¦ Hypothesisāāit rained yesterday. Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ā¦ Inferenceāāit rained yesterday thatās the reason why the soil is wet. ā¾Homoeopathy is based on inductive method of reasoning. This inductive logic requires ā¶ EXACT OBSERVATION : ā¾Hahnemannās honest disappointment with practice of medicine made him to quit practice and he turned to translations. ā¾HisĀ observation on the effect of cinchona bark and experimentation with medicinal substances made him understand the ability of the drug to produce symptoms on one hand and the symptoms of the patient on the other. ā¶ CORRECT INTERPRETATIONĀ : ā¾Thorough study of the phenomenon produced by the experiments or provings on different groups,age, sex reduced the probability of error in observation. ā¶ RATIONAL EXPLANATIONĀ : ā¾Explaining the observed facts by referringĀ them with known natural laws. ā¶ Scientific constructionĀ : ā¾Putting the facts in such coordination that system reached shall agree with reality. ā¾He applied the principles evolved from inductive reasoning and correlated them with experiments he conducted.Ā ā¾Hahnemann discussed about principles of homoeopathy, analysis of other modes of treatment,qualitiesĀ and duties of a physician,proving of drugs on healthy humanbeings , classification of diseases, selection of remedy, dosage, causes of disease,and auxillary methods of treatment in his bookĀ ORGANON OF MEDICINEĀ in the form of aphorisms. š³ UTILITY OF LOGIC š³ ā¾Logic furnishes scientific knowledge of the principles of correct thinking by the observance of which truth is attained errors detected and avoided. Logic is the science of sciences. ā¾Every science must conform to the general law of correct thinking with which Logic is concerned. ā¾Logic is an intellectual discipline. ā¾The study of Logic cultivates the power of abstract thinking and trains and develops the reasoning powers. ā¾In Logic the Homoeopathic Physician not only can conduct his daily works with ease and facility but also can solve his most difficult and important problems š³ LOGIC AND ITS HOMOEOPATHIC APPLICATIONS š³ ā« INTRODUCTION: ā¾Science is the application of principles to art and life. ā¾The principles are deduced from facts by the exercise of reason. The setting is conducted according to fixed laws, which is our business to learn and apply. ā¾Learn how to reason scientifically upon the facts of his department is as essential for the homeopathic Physician as it is for any other scientific man. ā¾Analysis of the Organon of Hahnemann as well as of the history of Homoeopathy and the life of its founder shows clearly that Homoeopathy is a product of logic (both deduction and induction) applied to the subject of medicine. ā¾Logic is essentially a tool for discoveries and advancement and not for argument. š³ RELATION BETWEEN LOGIC AND ORGANON š³ The semantics of ORGANON are simplified as: ā¶A method of scientific investigation, ā¶An instrument of thoughts, ā¶A system of logic, ā¶Literary work. It also means, ā¶An organ or system. ā¶A group of logical requirements for scientific inquiry or demonstration. ā¶Any major work of an author which sets down many fundamental principles in that specific topic. ā¶And hence logic and organon functions as one single unit and are inseparable and hence Homoeopathy from Logic. š³ FOUR METHODS OF INDUCTION IN SEARCH FOR THE CAUSE: š³ ā« METHOD OF AGREEMENT : in which a condition uniformly present is assumed to be probably a cause ā« METHOD OF DIFFERENCE : in which the happening of an event when a condition is present and its failure when a condition is absent lead to the assumption of that condition as a cause. ā« METHOD OF CONCOMITANT VARIATION : In which the simultaneous variation In similar the degree of condition and event establishes a causal relation ā« METHOD OF RESIDUES OR OF RESIDUAL VARIATIONS : where after subtracting from a phenomenon that part due to causes already established the remainder is held to be due to some other unascertained cause or to the known remaining causes. š³ MODERN STATISTICAL RESEARCH STUDIES AND LOGIC š³ The steps which are necessary to carry out a research study includes., ā¶Formulating the research problem ā¶Review of the literature ā¶Formulation of the hypothesis ā¶Decision on the research design ā¶Decision On the sample is design ā¶The collection of data (un prejudiced) ā¶Analysis of the data ā¶Testing of hypotheses ā¶Generalization and interpretation ā¶Research report are nothing but the steps of inductive methodology . ________________________________ ā¬ SOURSE: INTERNET. ā¬ NOTE: THESE NOTES ARE PREPARED ONLY FOR STUDY PORPOSE. ā¬ POSTED BY: TEAM HOMEOPATHY MCQS [ ONLINE HELPING HANDS FOR PREPRATIONS OF VARIOUS COMPITITIVE EXAMS IN HOMEOPATHY LIKE AIAPGET, UPSC, STATE PSC, NRHM EXAMS ETC ] ā¦ļø SINCE : 2014 - 15. š WITH EXCELENT RESULTS. š FOLLOW US š š³ TEAM HOMEOPATHY MCQS š³ ā¾ WEBSITE: https://praveensh2005.wixsite.com/teamhomeopathymcqs ā¾ TELEGRAM : https://t.me/teamHOMEOPATHYMCQ https://t.me/teamH_MCQS ā¾ FACEBOOK : https://www.facebook.com/teamhomeopathymcqs/ ā¾ WHATSAPP: https://chat.whatsapp.com/HGAT8TWnEZy60DhrtF5O2b
top of page
bottom of page
Comments